The Great Indian Wardrobe Shift: Why Our Ancestors Were "Bolder" Than Us
- Aayu Dewalekar
- 5 days ago
- 3 min read
The common modern narrative that "Indian culture" requires women to be covered from head to toe is actually a significant historical misunderstanding. When we look back at the vast span of Indian history long before the influence of foreign invasions and colonial rule we find a society that was remarkably comfortable with the human form. If you visit the ancient temples of Khajuraho, the Sun Temple at Konark, or the stunning murals of the Ajanta and Ellora caves, the evidence is etched in stone and pigment. These sacred spaces depict women in various states of dress, often with the upper body entirely bare or adorned only with intricate jewelry. In ancient India, the body was not viewed as a source of shame or a "sinful" object that needed to be hidden to protect morality; instead, it was celebrated as a natural, divine vessel. Modesty was defined by an individual’s character, conduct, and spiritual standing rather than the yardage of fabric they wore.
This freedom was most evident in the traditional evolution of the saree itself.

For centuries, the saree was simply a long, unstitched piece of cloth draped with incredible ingenuity to suit the climate and the activity at hand. The "blouse" and the "petticoat," which many today consider essential components of "traditional" Indian attire, are actually relatively modern additions. In regions like Kerala, Bengal, and parts of Central India, women traditionally wore the saree without any stitched upper garment. The Mundum Neriyathum of Kerala was worn without a blouse for generations, and in Bengal, the drape was designed to cover the torso while leaving the arms and back free for comfort in the sweltering humidity. This wasn't considered "bold" or "provocative" it was the standard way of life. No one pointed fingers or questioned a woman’s virtue based on her bare skin because the "male gaze" had not yet been institutionalized as a tool of moral policing.
The dramatic shift in our wardrobe and our mindset occurred primarily during the British Colonial era. When Victorian-era Britishers arrived in India, they were deeply uncomfortable with the local attire, which they viewed through a lens of rigid, puritanical "modesty." To the Victorian mind, showing an ankle was scandalous, so the sight of Indian women in blouse-less sarees was deemed "primitive" and "uncivilized."
To gain social standing and appear "refined" in the eyes of the colonizers, the Indian elite began to adopt Western-style stitched garments. Figures like Jnanadanandini Devi, the sister-in-law of Rabindranath Tagore, famously popularized the modern saree-blouse-petticoat ensemble after being refused entry to certain clubs for not wearing "proper" upper clothing. Gradually, the Victorian idea that a "respectable" woman must be fully covered was internalized by Indian society, and we began to view our own ancestral traditions through the judgmental eyes of our occupiers.

Today, there is a massive irony in the way we criticize modern fashion. When a woman wears a backless choli, a halter neck, or a crop top, she is often accused of being "too Westernized" or "abandoning her culture." However, history shows that the high-neck, long-sleeved, fully-covered look is actually the Western import, while the freedom to show skin for comfort and aesthetics is the original Indian tradition. Our culture was never about hiding; it was about adaptation to our tropical climate and a celebration of the self. By shaming women today for their clothing choices, we are not "protecting" ancient Indian values we are actually upholding the restrictive, 19th-century moral codes of the British Empire.
Reclaiming this history is vital because it changes the conversation from one of "shame" to one of "truth." Understanding our past allows us to see that a woman’s worth has never been, and should never be, tied to how much skin she chooses to show or hide. Whether a woman chooses to wear a hijab, a conservative saree, or a backless top, the choice should be hers, free from the false weight of "cultural preservation." Our ancestors lived with a level of confidence and bodily autonomy that we are only now starting to rediscover. By acknowledging that our culture was built on comfort, confidence, and natural beauty, we can finally stop policing women’s bodies and start celebrating the true diversity and freedom that defined India for thousands of years.





Comments