top of page

Into Valhalla with a Very Good Boy: A Review of Heart of the Beast

Writer: Kenneth Hopkins
Kenneth Hopkins
4 hours ago
2 min read

When you sit down to watch Heart of the Beast, the first thing that hits you is the sheer visual poetry. It is a dialogue-light, cinematic spectacle that immerses you completely into the heart of the wild. If you were to describe its atmospheric pacing, you might find yourself surprisingly reminded of an Imtiaz Ali film. Much like Ali's romanticized, slow-living odysseys set against the breathtaking mountainscapes of Kashmir, this movie takes its time breathing in the altitude of the Western Hemisphere. The specific visual aesthetics are its own, but the stunning cinematography, the flawless camera movements, and that lingering, soulful reverence for the mountains feel universally transcendent.

Yet, for all its majestic beauty, it is hard to shake the feeling from the jump that the film is a rather shameless play by Brad Pitt for an Oscar. Pitt anchors the survival drama, but tragically, he comes across as a highly generic, white American warmonger. In fact, his character feels like a walking, talking embodiment of everything J.D. Vance probably looks in the mirror and wishes he could be. It is a rugged, machismo-heavy performance that leans entirely into a specific breed of American mythology.

And speaking of mythology, Heart of the Beast isn't exactly subtle about its subtext. The film operates as an incredibly on-the-nose metaphor for a soul’s journey into Valhalla, heavily reinforcing the classic "white Viking" trope. This is most evident in Pitt's canine companion, a German Shepherd named Odin—literally named after the Norse god of war.

It’s a loaded choice of breed and name that genuinely makes you think. A German Shepherd named Odin operates as a rather dark throwback to the historical reality that the Germans were masters of eugenics, selectively breeding dogs with the grim belief that they could eventually apply the same science to humans. You can't help but feel that this particular cocktail of Nazi-esque, pure-blood affinities and Viking-warrior posturing was tailor-made for a very specific demographic—perhaps Americans harboring those exact proclivities, or, more bluntly, a certain crowd of rednecks.

But let’s set the socio-political baggage aside, because the true, undisputed star of this film is Odin. Pitt affectionately calls the dog "Odie," which serves as a cute pop-culture nod to the Garfield comics (even if the comic-strip Odie was definitively not a German Shepherd). If anyone in this film deserves an Oscar, it is this dog. With his devastatingly cute puppy eyes and sheer on-screen presence, the dog carries the movie's emotional weight on his furry shoulders. He does a truly spectacular job.

Made with an immense amount of heart, the film ultimately succeeds as a gripping "man versus wild" fable. And for those who have anxiety about watching animal movies: breathe easy. Without giving away any major narrative spoilers, the dog does not die.

In the end, despite its heavy-handed metaphors and transparent award-seeking, Heart of the Beast remains a genuinely good film. I would give it a generous 6.2 out of 10. It is a gorgeous journey into nature that I would 100% recommend to everyone—if only to witness the best canine performance of the year against some of the most stunning mountainscapes ever committed to film.

Comments


Advertisement

bottom of page