The GIVA Raksha Bandhan Ad Controversy: Suzanne Bernert Asks if Brands Have Lost Touch with Reality

Festive advertising in India is usually a heartwarming affair, but jewelry brand GIVA’s recent Raksha Bandhan campaign has found itself at the center of a heated online debate. Actress Suzanne Bernert recently took to her platform to dissect the ad, raising sharp questions about the intersection of modern styling, traditional Indian values, and the calculated nature of viral marketing.

Here is a breakdown of why the campaign is drawing criticism and what it says about the current state of brand endorsements.

The Styling Debate: Red Carpet vs. Rakhi

The core of the backlash revolves around the wardrobe choices made for the festival-centric commercial. Bernert pointed out that if the ad had been a generic promotion for a necklace or earrings, the outfit would likely not have been a topic of discussion. However, because the commercial specifically depicts the sacred tradition of a sister tying a Rakhi to her brother, the styling felt jarring to many viewers.

"I have no issue with her outfit if it would have been a red carpet event," Bernert noted, emphasizing that the glamorous look simply did not fit the traditional idea of Raksha Bandhan. She added that wearing such an outfit to tie a Rakhi might elicit a confused reaction in a real-world family setting.

"The biggest disservice done to women is saying that female empowerment and feminism means less clothes." — Suzanne Bernert 

Disconnected from "Bharat"?

The controversy highlights a growing disconnect between high-fashion ad agencies and the everyday realities of Indian households. Bernert expressed concern that many actors and advertising agencies live inside a "bubble," having lost touch with the cultural fabric and sanskari norms of Bharat.

Addressing comments that defended the outfit by comparing it to an actress wearing a bikini in a movie, Bernert drew a firm line between fictional cinema and festive advertising. A movie is a fictitious story, she argued, whereas a Raksha Bandhan ad is meant to reflect cultural realities.

A Calculated PR Stunt?

In the digital age, out-rage often translates to reach. Bernert raised a crucial question: Was this styling choice made on purpose to create a controversy? By sparking a debate, a brand that might not have been in the constant limelight is suddenly elevated to the top of trending discussions.

https://youtu.be/SbTONHqJsSo?si=BA439nJFvzMogx_e

Initially, Bernert assumed the actress in the ad was simply wearing what the makers instructed, noting that actors are often forced into outfits they don't feel entirely comfortable in. However, the dynamic shifted upon discovering that the actress is not just talent for hire, but a brand ambassador and stakeholder. This level of involvement suggests that the talent likely had a significant say in the styling and overall look of the campaign, putting the onus of the creative choices back on her as well.